4.3 Mobius Transformations

Möbius (Linear Fractional) Transformations

A Möbius transformation is a rational function of the form:

S(z)=az+bcz+d,where adbc0

Its derivative:

S(z)=adbc(cz+d)2

Inverse Transformation

Solve for z from w=az+bcz+d:

Multiply both sides:

w(cz+d)=az+bwcz+wd=az+b

Bring z terms together:

wczaz=bwdz(wca)=bwd

So the inverse is:

z=dwbcw+a=S1(w)

Special Cases


Notes

Möbius Decomposition

Let:

S(z)=az+bcz+d,adbc0

Case 1: c=0

S(z)=az+bd=adz+bd

→ translation + scaling


Case 2: c0

Rewrite:

az+bcz+d=ac+bcadc21z+dc

This is:

  1. zz+dc (translation)
  2. 1z+dc (inversion)
  3. bcadc2 (dilation/rotation)
  4. +ac (translation)

Conclusion

Any Möbius map = composition of:

Any Möbius transformation maps circles and lines to circles and lines.

The inversion has a magic property: it maps the set of {lines and circles} to itself. Clearly translations, dilation and rotation already do this, but inversion (z1/z) does this:

C-Plane (C)line, circle, etc.Stereographic ProjectionRiemann Sphere (C)Möbius TransformationMöbius TransformationRiemann Sphere (C)Inverse Stereographic ProjectionC-Plane (C)line, circle, etc.

Proof

Circle mapped by inversion

Let a circle:

|za|2=r2

Apply inversion z=1w:

(*)|1wa|2=r2|1aw|2=r2|w|2

Let w=u+iv and expand:

|w|2=u2+v2aw=a(u+iv),aw=a(uiv)|1aw|2=(1auiav)(1au+iav)=12(a)u2(a)v+|a|2(u2+v2)

So from ():

(|a|2r2)(u2+v2)+Au+Bv+1=0

If |a|=r → linear in u,v → line
Else → quadratic → circle because reasons


Line mapped by inversion

Let a line: Ax+By=C, i.e.,

A(z)+B(z)=C

Let z=1w with w=u+iv:

1w=uivu2+v2(1w)=uu2+v2,(1w)=vu2+v2

So:

Auu2+v2+Bvu2+v2=CAuBv=C(u2+v2)

Conclusion

Inversion z1z maps:

So Möbius transformations (built from inversions + affine maps) preserve circles and lines.

The Cross Ratio & Canonical Möbius Map

Given any three distinct points z2,z3,z4 in the extended complex plane C^=C, there exists a unique Möbius transformation S(z) that maps:

This map is used to define the cross ratio and is central in projective geometry and complex analysis.

The Cross Ratio

Definition:
The cross ratio of four distinct points z,z2,z3,z4 is:

(z,z2,z3,z4):=S(z)

where S is the unique Möbius transformation mapping:

z21,z30,z4

(z,z2,z3,z4) is not a list of points, it means cross-ratio of z,z2,z3,z4

S(z)=(zz3)(z2z4)(zz4)(z2z3)

Which is a möbius transform


None of z2,z3,z4 are

S(z)=(zz3)(z2z4)(zz4)(z2z3)

This satisfies:

S(z2)=1,S(z3)=0,S(z4)=

If z2=:

S(z)=zz3zz4

If z3=:

S(z)=z2z4zz4

If z4=:

S(z)=zz3z2z3

Uniqueness of Such a Möbius Transformation

Let T be another Möbius map with the same action:

T(z2)=1,T(z3)=0,T(z4)=

Then ST1 fixes:

1,0,

So it must be the identity transformation. Let’s verify that.

Assume

ST1(z)=az+bcz+d

Then:

  1. ST1(0)=0:
a0+bc0+d=bd=0b=0
  1. ST1(1)=1:
ac+d=1a=c+d
  1. ST1()=:
ac=c=0

Now from a=c+d and c=0, we get:

a=d

So the map becomes:

ST1(z)=azd=z

Hence:

S=T

Summary

Theorem (Möbius Invariance)

For any Möbius transformation T, we have:

(Tz1,Tz2,Tz3,Tz4)=(z1,z2,z3,z4)

Proof

Let S(z)=(z,z2,z3,z4). Then define:

F:=ST1

Then:

F(Tz2)=S(z2)=1,F(Tz3)=S(z3)=0,F(Tz4)=S(z4)=

So F is the Möbius map sending Tz21, Tz30, Tz4
by uniqueness, F=(z,Tz2,Tz3,Tz4)
Therefore:

(Tz1,Tz2,Tz3,Tz4)=F(Tz1)=S(z1)=(z1,z2,z3,z4)

Cross-Ratio Circle Test

The cross-ratio (z1,z2,z3,z4) is real the four points lie on a circle or a line.

Proof

(z1,z2,z3,z4)R(Sz1,Sz2,Sz3,Sz4)R(Sz1,1,0,)RSz1RSz1line through 1,0,z1 lies on the circle or line through z2,z3,z4

Symmetry

Definition

Points z and z are symmetric w.r.t. the circle through z1,z2,z3 iff:

(z,z1,z2,z3)=(z,z1,z2,z3)orSz=Sz

Note

If (w,z2,z3,z4) are given, then:

(w,z2,z3,z4)=(w,z2,z3,z4)

Theorem — Mobius Transformations Preserve Symmetry

If a Möbius transformation sends a circle C1 to a circle C2, it sends symmetric pairs w.r.t. C1 to symmetric pairs w.r.t. C2.